Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (4.4/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for US buyers who need hardware-adjacent engineering depth and are fine with an EU-based team. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for US enterprises that want a publicly traded vendor with audited financials. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1993 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA (large Ukraine delivery centers) |
| Team size | 200+ | 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe | The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it |
| Pricing model | Flexible engagement models, tech consulting, team extension or staff augmentation, and full-scope product development from concept through delivery, scoped to the client's actual need rather than a fixed package | Enterprise engagement models, dedicated teams, and managed delivery, negotiated per program |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Media |
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in Lviv, Ukraine in 2007 and has grown to a team of 200+ engineers, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; and Kraków, Poland. It has no physical US location, which matters for a site built around a US buyer, so it's worth stating up front rather than burying it: this is a European delivery team, full stop. What it brings instead is depth most generalist outsourcing vendors on this list don't staff for, embedded systems, firmware, electrical engineering, and connectivity work, wrapped in a broader cloud, data, and AI practice. Clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and the company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification alongside direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under NYSE: EPAM, which puts it in a different regulatory and financial-disclosure category than almost every other company reviewed here. Founded in 1993, it employs more than 50,000 people globally, with a large share of engineering delivery historically concentrated in Ukraine and Belarus before the company diversified its delivery footprint further across Central Europe, Latin America, and India in response to regional disruption. For a US procurement team, the NYSE listing means audited public financials and SEC disclosure, a level of transparency few privately held outsourcing vendors offer.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| IT consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff aug / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Team extension, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | A US medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built by one accountable team., An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure over-the-air firmware updates. | A public company or regulated enterprise that specifically wants a vendor with SEC-level financial transparency., A large-scale digital transformation program that needs sustained capacity across multiple delivery regions. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Real embedded, firmware, and electrical engineering depth most of the general-purpose vendors on this list simply don't have on staff. |
| + | One vendor covers hardware, firmware, cloud, and AI instead of a US buyer stitching together three separate contracts. |
| + | The Hamburg and London offices put a meaningful chunk of the team within a workable overlap of US East Coast mornings, better than a delivery center on the other side of the Pacific. |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification plus healthcare-specific delivery under IEC 62304 and FDA 21 CFR Part 820. |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code transfer on every engagement. |
| - | No US legal entity or physical office, so a buyer who needs a domestic contracting party for procurement or insurance reasons should factor that in before signing |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, only development and ongoing maintenance |
| - | Not the right fit for a buyer who just wants a plain web or mobile app with no hardware or deep-technical component involved |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded on NYSE, so financial health and disclosures are auditable rather than taken on faith the way a private vendor requires. |
| + | US-incorporated with a Pennsylvania headquarters, giving procurement a domestic legal entity by default. |
| + | Deep, decades-long engineering bench across Central and Eastern Europe backing that US corporate shell. |
| + | Diversified delivery footprint across multiple regions reduces single-country geopolitical exposure compared to firms concentrated in one country. |
| - | Public-company scale means formal governance and account processes that move more slowly than a boutique vendor's |
| - | Pricing sits closer to large-enterprise-consulting territory than to a boutique firm's rates, which a smaller buyer should budget for upfront |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a US medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built by one accountable team.
Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a public company or regulated enterprise that specifically wants a vendor with SEC-level financial transparency.
The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Media.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A US medtech startup that needs firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built by one accountable team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure over-the-air firmware updates. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A public company or regulated enterprise that specifically wants a vendor with SEC-level financial transparency. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A large-scale digital transformation program that needs sustained capacity across multiple delivery regions. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (USA) projects. Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe.
EPAM Systems (4.4/5) is worth a look if you need a large-scale digital transformation program that needs sustained capacity across multiple delivery regions. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than EPAM Systems?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: real embedded, firmware, and electrical engineering depth most of the general-purpose vendors on this list simply don't have on staff. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded on NYSE, so financial health and disclosures are auditable rather than taken on faith the way a private vendor requires.
How do Lemberg Solutions and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses flexible engagement models, tech consulting, team extension or staff augmentation, and full-scope product development from concept through delivery, scoped to the client's actual need rather than a fixed package pricing. EPAM Systems uses enterprise engagement models, dedicated teams, and managed delivery, negotiated per program pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and EPAM Systems?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.