ScienceSoft
A Texas-headquartered firm since 1989, older than most Eastern European outsourcing vendors by a decade or more
Founded 1989 | McKinney, Texas, USA | 750+ employees
custom-software-developmentai-ml-developmentqa-testingcybersecurity
What is ScienceSoft?
ScienceSoft was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with more than 750 technical professionals on staff. Its client list includes IBM, Ford, eBay, Walmart, and NASA, and it holds a 4.8 rating on Clutch along with recognition in the IAOP Global Outsourcing 100 list across multiple years. Its Texas base and nearly four-decade operating history predate the wave of Eastern European IT-outsourcing firms that opened around and after 2000, giving it one of the longer track records on this list.
ScienceSoft works primarily with clients in Healthcare, Financial services, Retail sectors. Its primary differentiator is: A US headquarters and nearly four-decade operating history, older than most of its Eastern European competitors.
ScienceSoft tech stack and services
AWSAzure.NETJavaPythonData & AI platforms
| Service area |
|---|
| Custom Software Development |
| AI/ML Development |
| QA & Testing |
| Cybersecurity |
ScienceSoft pricing
Short answer: ScienceSoft uses a fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From not disclosed | Well-defined scope |
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Consulting | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
ScienceSoft does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
ScienceSoft pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +A US headquarters in Texas that dates to the company's founding, unlike a sales address added years afterward. | -At roughly 750 professionals, its total capacity is smaller than most of the mid-size firms on this list |
| +Nearly four decades of operating history, longer than most competitors on this list. | -Marketing materials lean heavily on named client logos, worth verifying the specific scope of each relationship directly rather than assuming full-program ownership |
| +Named clients including IBM, Ford, and Walmart back its enterprise credibility. | |
| +Strong third-party review ratings, a 4.8 on Clutch, and repeated IAOP Global Outsourcing 100 recognition. |
ScienceSoft vs alternatives
How ScienceSoft compares to the other top IT Outsourcing (USA) outsourcing companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | US buyers who need hardware-adjacent engineering depth and... | Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe | 4.9 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | US enterprises wanting a domestic HQ backing a... | An Austin, Texas corporate headquarters that functions as a true legal seat rather than a sales office bolted onto a European or Indian parent | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | US enterprises that want a publicly traded vendor... | The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| GlobalLogic | Silicon Valley-adjacent product companies wanting Hitachi-backed corporate stability. | A Santa Clara headquarters and Hitachi ownership paired with a deep Ukraine engineering bench | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | West Coast retail and e-commerce enterprises wanting NASDAQ-level... | NASDAQ-listed and headquartered in the Bay Area, small enough for direct executive access | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Accenture | Large US enterprises running multi-country digital transformation programs. | No competitor on this list can staff a larger or more geographically distributed program, and few can match its dedicated US federal practice | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Cognizant | US enterprises wanting Indian-scale delivery capacity under a... | A legally US-headquartered, NASDAQ-listed corporate structure wrapped around India-scale delivery capacity | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Ciklum | US buyers comfortable with an EU-based vendor at... | A larger, more general-purpose European delivery team than Lemberg, without the hardware and embedded specialization | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| BairesDev | US teams wanting same-timezone nearshore collaboration over offshore... | Purpose-built nearshore delivery from Latin America for near-total US timezone overlap | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| DataArt | US buyers in finance, media, or healthcare wanting... | A company that was founded in New York from day one, unlike a European or Indian firm that opened a US office years later | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Perficient | US enterprises specifically wanting a fully domestic delivery... | The one company on this list where the engineers themselves, rather than just the corporate address, are based onshore in the US | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Tata Consultancy Services | US Fortune 500 enterprises needing the largest possible... | The single largest workforce of any company on this list, backed by decades of Fortune 500 relationships | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Infosys | US enterprises wanting a blended offshore-plus-domestic-hub delivery model. | Dedicated US-based delivery hubs that blend domestic and offshore capacity instead of running a purely offshore model | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Persistent Systems | US software companies wanting product-engineering depth over generalist... | A software-product-engineering specialization rather than a broad IT-services generalist offering | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Encora | US buyers wanting flexible nearshore or offshore delivery... | A recently relocated Santa Clara HQ backing genuinely global delivery flexibility across six regions | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | US buyers wanting delivery-continuity assurance spread across multiple... | An eight-country office footprint built specifically to spread delivery risk beyond a single region | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intellias | US automotive and mobility companies wanting sector-specific engineering... | A concentrated automotive and navigation-software specialty most generalist competitors can't match | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Capgemini | US enterprises wanting European governance standards at global... | A dedicated US federal-contracting arm layered onto a French-headquartered global consultancy | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| DXC Technology | US enterprises with legacy mainframe systems needing a... | A direct corporate successor to established US IT firms, distinct from an offshore firm that added a US address years into its history | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Coherent Solutions | US mid-market buyers wanting an established Midwest HQ... | Three decades of US headquarters continuity, longer than most of the offshore vendors it competes against | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Softeq | US hardware startups wanting embedded engineering depth from... | US-headquartered hardware and firmware engineering, the closest domestic comparison to Lemberg's specialty on this list | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Itransition | US buyers wanting a self-funded, independently owned vendor... | A privately held, self-funded operating history rather than venture or private-equity ownership | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Wipro | Large US enterprises needing very high-volume, broad IT-services... | An eight-decade corporate history spanning far beyond software into diversified industrial holdings | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| HCLTech | US enterprises wanting a blended offshore-and-domestic-delivery model at... | Visible investment in US-based engineering centers layered onto large offshore delivery capacity | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Tech Mahindra | US telecom companies needing an outsourcing partner with... | A telecom-sector specialty inherited from its founding history, backed by the wider Mahindra Group | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Intetics | US buyers wanting a client-managed dedicated team model... | A Florida headquarters running a specific client-managed dedicated-team delivery model | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| 10Pearls | US buyers wanting a choice between nearshore Latin... | A Virginia headquarters running both nearshore Latin American and offshore Pakistani delivery | 3.6 | Full comparison |
ScienceSoft FAQ
What is ScienceSoft?
A Texas-headquartered firm since 1989, older than most Eastern European outsourcing vendors by a decade or more
How much does ScienceSoft charge?
ScienceSoft uses fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does ScienceSoft use?
ScienceSoft works with AWS, Azure, .NET, Java, Python, Data & AI platforms. Primary industries served include Healthcare, Financial services, Retail.
Is ScienceSoft right for enterprise?
US buyers wanting a Texas-headquartered vendor with a long, verifiable track record. 750+ team size. Key consideration: At roughly 750 professionals, its total capacity is smaller than most of the mid-size firms on this list.
What are the best ScienceSoft alternatives?
The best alternatives to ScienceSoft depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and ai practice, delivered entirely from europe
- SoftServe: an austin, texas corporate headquarters that functions as a true legal seat rather than a sales office bolted onto a european or indian parent
- EPAM Systems: the only company on this list that is both us-incorporated and nyse-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it
Compare ScienceSoft with other IT Outsourcing (USA) outsourcing companies
ScienceSoft vs Lemberg Solutions ScienceSoft vs SoftServe ScienceSoft vs EPAM Systems ScienceSoft vs GlobalLogic ScienceSoft vs Grid Dynamics ScienceSoft vs Accenture ScienceSoft vs Cognizant ScienceSoft vs Ciklum ScienceSoft vs BairesDev ScienceSoft vs DataArt ScienceSoft vs Perficient ScienceSoft vs Tata Consultancy Services ScienceSoft vs Infosys ScienceSoft vs Persistent Systems ScienceSoft vs Encora ScienceSoft vs N-iX ScienceSoft vs Intellias ScienceSoft vs Capgemini ScienceSoft vs DXC Technology ScienceSoft vs Coherent Solutions ScienceSoft vs Softeq ScienceSoft vs Itransition ScienceSoft vs Wipro ScienceSoft vs HCLTech ScienceSoft vs Tech Mahindra ScienceSoft vs Intetics ScienceSoft vs 10Pearls
Verify all details directly with ScienceSoft before making a decision.