Ciklum
A London-headquartered firm that shares Lemberg's EU-delivery model but at a much larger scale
Founded 2002 | London, United Kingdom (Kyiv-founded; large Ukraine delivery centers) | ~3,900 employees
custom-software-developmentdedicated-development-teamcloud-devopsteam-extension
What is Ciklum?
Kyiv is where Ciklum got its start in 2002, though the corporate headquarters has since moved to London, United Kingdom, overseeing roughly 3,900 employees who deliver primarily from Ukraine and other European locations. A US buyer weighing this list will find Ciklum lands in a similar bucket to Lemberg Solutions, a European delivery team with no US legal entity, but at roughly twenty times Lemberg's headcount and without the same embedded-hardware specialization. Choosing between the two comes down to whether raw scale or technical depth matters more for the project at hand.
Ciklum works primarily with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media sectors. Its primary differentiator is: A larger, more general-purpose European delivery team than Lemberg, without the hardware and embedded specialization.
Ciklum tech stack and services
AWSAzure.NETReactNode.jsJava
| Service area |
|---|
| Custom Software Development |
| Dedicated Teams |
| Cloud & DevOps |
| Team Extension |
Ciklum pricing
Short answer: Ciklum uses a dedicated teams and staff augmentation, scoped per engagement pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Team extension | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Fixed project | From not disclosed | Well-defined scope |
Ciklum does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Ciklum pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +London corporate headquarters gives it a UK legal entity, useful for a US buyer working through European contracting norms. | -No US legal entity, so a domestic buyer works through UK or Ukrainian contracting structures instead |
| +Substantial scale, roughly 3,900 people, well beyond most boutique competitors on this list. | -Lacks the embedded hardware and firmware specialization that differentiates a firm like Lemberg for hardware-adjacent products |
| +Broad general-purpose software delivery rather than a narrow technical niche. | |
| +Two decades of operating history and established enterprise references. |
Ciklum vs alternatives
How Ciklum compares to the other top IT Outsourcing (USA) outsourcing companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | US buyers who need hardware-adjacent engineering depth and... | Deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and AI practice, delivered entirely from Europe | 4.9 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | US enterprises wanting a domestic HQ backing a... | An Austin, Texas corporate headquarters that functions as a true legal seat rather than a sales office bolted onto a European or Indian parent | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | US enterprises that want a publicly traded vendor... | The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| GlobalLogic | Silicon Valley-adjacent product companies wanting Hitachi-backed corporate stability. | A Santa Clara headquarters and Hitachi ownership paired with a deep Ukraine engineering bench | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | West Coast retail and e-commerce enterprises wanting NASDAQ-level... | NASDAQ-listed and headquartered in the Bay Area, small enough for direct executive access | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Accenture | Large US enterprises running multi-country digital transformation programs. | No competitor on this list can staff a larger or more geographically distributed program, and few can match its dedicated US federal practice | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Cognizant | US enterprises wanting Indian-scale delivery capacity under a... | A legally US-headquartered, NASDAQ-listed corporate structure wrapped around India-scale delivery capacity | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BairesDev | US teams wanting same-timezone nearshore collaboration over offshore... | Purpose-built nearshore delivery from Latin America for near-total US timezone overlap | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| DataArt | US buyers in finance, media, or healthcare wanting... | A company that was founded in New York from day one, unlike a European or Indian firm that opened a US office years later | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Perficient | US enterprises specifically wanting a fully domestic delivery... | The one company on this list where the engineers themselves, rather than just the corporate address, are based onshore in the US | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Tata Consultancy Services | US Fortune 500 enterprises needing the largest possible... | The single largest workforce of any company on this list, backed by decades of Fortune 500 relationships | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Infosys | US enterprises wanting a blended offshore-plus-domestic-hub delivery model. | Dedicated US-based delivery hubs that blend domestic and offshore capacity instead of running a purely offshore model | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Persistent Systems | US software companies wanting product-engineering depth over generalist... | A software-product-engineering specialization rather than a broad IT-services generalist offering | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Encora | US buyers wanting flexible nearshore or offshore delivery... | A recently relocated Santa Clara HQ backing genuinely global delivery flexibility across six regions | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | US buyers wanting delivery-continuity assurance spread across multiple... | An eight-country office footprint built specifically to spread delivery risk beyond a single region | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intellias | US automotive and mobility companies wanting sector-specific engineering... | A concentrated automotive and navigation-software specialty most generalist competitors can't match | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ScienceSoft | US buyers wanting a Texas-headquartered vendor with a... | A US headquarters and nearly four-decade operating history, older than most of its Eastern European competitors | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Capgemini | US enterprises wanting European governance standards at global... | A dedicated US federal-contracting arm layered onto a French-headquartered global consultancy | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| DXC Technology | US enterprises with legacy mainframe systems needing a... | A direct corporate successor to established US IT firms, distinct from an offshore firm that added a US address years into its history | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Coherent Solutions | US mid-market buyers wanting an established Midwest HQ... | Three decades of US headquarters continuity, longer than most of the offshore vendors it competes against | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Softeq | US hardware startups wanting embedded engineering depth from... | US-headquartered hardware and firmware engineering, the closest domestic comparison to Lemberg's specialty on this list | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Itransition | US buyers wanting a self-funded, independently owned vendor... | A privately held, self-funded operating history rather than venture or private-equity ownership | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Wipro | Large US enterprises needing very high-volume, broad IT-services... | An eight-decade corporate history spanning far beyond software into diversified industrial holdings | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| HCLTech | US enterprises wanting a blended offshore-and-domestic-delivery model at... | Visible investment in US-based engineering centers layered onto large offshore delivery capacity | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Tech Mahindra | US telecom companies needing an outsourcing partner with... | A telecom-sector specialty inherited from its founding history, backed by the wider Mahindra Group | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Intetics | US buyers wanting a client-managed dedicated team model... | A Florida headquarters running a specific client-managed dedicated-team delivery model | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| 10Pearls | US buyers wanting a choice between nearshore Latin... | A Virginia headquarters running both nearshore Latin American and offshore Pakistani delivery | 3.6 | Full comparison |
Ciklum FAQ
What is Ciklum?
A London-headquartered firm that shares Lemberg's EU-delivery model but at a much larger scale
How much does Ciklum charge?
Ciklum uses dedicated teams and staff augmentation, scoped per engagement pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Ciklum use?
Ciklum works with AWS, Azure, .NET, React, Node.js, Java. Primary industries served include Retail, Financial services, Media.
Is Ciklum right for enterprise?
US buyers comfortable with an EU-based vendor at larger scale than a boutique. ~3,900 team size. Key consideration: No US legal entity, so a domestic buyer works through UK or Ukrainian contracting structures instead.
What are the best Ciklum alternatives?
The best alternatives to Ciklum depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: deep embedded and firmware engineering under one roof with a full cloud and ai practice, delivered entirely from europe
- SoftServe: an austin, texas corporate headquarters that functions as a true legal seat rather than a sales office bolted onto a european or indian parent
- EPAM Systems: the only company on this list that is both us-incorporated and nyse-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it
Compare Ciklum with other IT Outsourcing (USA) outsourcing companies
Ciklum vs Lemberg Solutions Ciklum vs SoftServe Ciklum vs EPAM Systems Ciklum vs GlobalLogic Ciklum vs Grid Dynamics Ciklum vs Accenture Ciklum vs Cognizant Ciklum vs BairesDev Ciklum vs DataArt Ciklum vs Perficient Ciklum vs Tata Consultancy Services Ciklum vs Infosys Ciklum vs Persistent Systems Ciklum vs Encora Ciklum vs N-iX Ciklum vs Intellias Ciklum vs ScienceSoft Ciklum vs Capgemini Ciklum vs DXC Technology Ciklum vs Coherent Solutions Ciklum vs Softeq Ciklum vs Itransition Ciklum vs Wipro Ciklum vs HCLTech Ciklum vs Tech Mahindra Ciklum vs Intetics Ciklum vs 10Pearls
Verify all details directly with Ciklum before making a decision.