EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.4/5) edges ahead of 10Pearls (3.6/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for US enterprises that want a publicly traded vendor with audited financials. 10Pearls is the stronger option for US buyers wanting a choice between nearshore Latin American and offshore delivery from one vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | 10Pearls |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2004 |
| HQ | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA (large Ukraine delivery centers) | Vienna, Virginia, USA |
| Team size | 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce | 1,400+ |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it | A Virginia headquarters running both nearshore Latin American and offshore Pakistani delivery |
| Pricing model | Enterprise engagement models, dedicated teams, and managed delivery, negotiated per program | Dedicated teams and fixed-scope engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS, Azure, React |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Media | Healthcare, Fintech, Retail |
EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under NYSE: EPAM, which puts it in a different regulatory and financial-disclosure category than almost every other company reviewed here. Founded in 1993, it employs more than 50,000 people globally, with a large share of engineering delivery historically concentrated in Ukraine and Belarus before the company diversified its delivery footprint further across Central Europe, Latin America, and India in response to regional disruption. For a US procurement team, the NYSE listing means audited public financials and SEC disclosure, a level of transparency few privately held outsourcing vendors offer.
10Pearls
10Pearls was founded in 2004 by brothers Imran and Zeeshan Aftab and is headquartered in Vienna, Virginia, with more than 1,400 experts working across offices in the US, Costa Rica, Colombia, the UK, Pakistan, and Peru. Its Latin American presence, Costa Rica, Colombia, and Peru, gives it a real nearshore option for US clients wanting timezone-aligned delivery, alongside its offshore Pakistan center for lower-cost work.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
| Capability | EPAM Systems | 10Pearls |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| IT consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff aug / team extension | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | 10Pearls |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | 10Pearls |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Managed services | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | 10Pearls |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail | Healthcare, Fintech, Retail |
| Best use cases | A public company or regulated enterprise that specifically wants a vendor with SEC-level financial transparency., A large-scale digital transformation program that needs sustained capacity across multiple delivery regions. | A US buyer wanting the flexibility to choose nearshore or offshore delivery from a single Virginia-headquartered vendor., A healthcare or fintech client benefiting from a founder-led firm's closer account attention. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded on NYSE, so financial health and disclosures are auditable rather than taken on faith the way a private vendor requires. |
| + | US-incorporated with a Pennsylvania headquarters, giving procurement a domestic legal entity by default. |
| + | Deep, decades-long engineering bench across Central and Eastern Europe backing that US corporate shell. |
| + | Diversified delivery footprint across multiple regions reduces single-country geopolitical exposure compared to firms concentrated in one country. |
| - | Public-company scale means formal governance and account processes that move more slowly than a boutique vendor's |
| - | Pricing sits closer to large-enterprise-consulting territory than to a boutique firm's rates, which a smaller buyer should budget for upfront |
| 10Pearls | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine Virginia headquarters, close to the Washington DC federal and enterprise corridor. |
| + | Real choice between nearshore Latin American delivery and lower-cost offshore Pakistani delivery under one vendor relationship. |
| + | Founder-led since 2004, with the original founders still leading the company. |
| + | Diversified six-office footprint across four continents. |
| - | At roughly 1,400 people, total capacity is smaller than most of the mid-size firms on this list |
| - | Splitting delivery between nearshore and offshore locations means it's worth clarifying up front exactly which team will staff a given project |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a public company or regulated enterprise that specifically wants a vendor with SEC-level financial transparency.
The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Media.
Who should choose 10Pearls?
A typical fit: a US buyer wanting the flexibility to choose nearshore or offshore delivery from a single Virginia-headquartered vendor.
A Virginia headquarters running both nearshore Latin American and offshore Pakistani delivery. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Fintech, Retail.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | EPAM Systems |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) vs 10Pearls (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | 10Pearls fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A public company or regulated enterprise that specifically wants a vendor with SEC-level financial transparency. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A large-scale digital transformation program that needs sustained capacity across multiple delivery regions. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A US buyer wanting the flexibility to choose nearshore or offshore delivery from a single Virginia-headquartered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A healthcare or fintech client benefiting from a founder-led firm's closer account attention. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls
EPAM Systems (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing (USA) projects. The only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it.
10Pearls (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need a healthcare or fintech client benefiting from a founder-led firm's closer account attention. If your situation matches that, 10Pearls is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs 10Pearls FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than 10Pearls?
EPAM Systems (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded on NYSE, so financial health and disclosures are auditable rather than taken on faith the way a private vendor requires. 10Pearls's strongest advantage: genuine Virginia headquarters, close to the Washington DC federal and enterprise corridor.
How do EPAM Systems and 10Pearls differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses enterprise engagement models, dedicated teams, and managed delivery, negotiated per program pricing. 10Pearls uses dedicated teams and fixed-scope engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or 10Pearls?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and 10Pearls?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the only company on this list that is both US-incorporated and NYSE-listed, with the disclosure obligations that come with it. 10Pearls's primary differentiator is: a Virginia headquarters running both nearshore Latin American and offshore Pakistani delivery. They also differ in team size (50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce vs 1,400+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Healthcare, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.